Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00764
Original file (BC 2014 00764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00764
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 19 Dec 12.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He submitted his TEB application on 19 Dec 12 and, at the time, was told there was plenty of time for approval of his request before his retirement date of 1 Feb 13.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of Master Sergeant (E-7) during the matter under review.  

The applicant has served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, was eligible to retire in 2009, and was entitled to Post-9/11 GI Benefits.  On the date he applied to transfer his benefits, he would have incurred no additional active duty service commitment (ADSC) for TEB benefits.

According to the documentation submitted by the applicant, he applied for the TEB Program on 19 Dec 12.  

Under Reserve Order EK-5698, dated 20 Jul 12, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve, effective 1 Feb 13.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice.  The Post-9/11 GI Bill became effective 1 Aug 09, and states an individual “…may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.”  The applicant was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB benefits to his dependents as defined in Public Law No 110-252.  Based upon the documentation provided by the applicant, to include the MilCONNECT screen shot, he attempted to transfer his benefits on 19 Dec 12.  The applicant claims that at the time he submitted his TEB request on 19 Dec 12, there was plenty of time for approval prior to his retirement on 1 Feb 13.  ARPC cannot take the action required to correct the member’s record, recommend approval. 
 
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to reflect that on 19 December 2012 he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. 




The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00764 in Executive Session on 13 Jan 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPTT, dated 24 Apr 14,
            w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05250

    Original file (BC 2013 05250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). The applicant refers...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04575

    Original file (BC-2011-04575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTT recommends denial of his request to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits. DPTT states that although the applicant would have been otherwise eligible for the benefit per the “Verification of Member’s Active Duty Service”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02088

    Original file (BC-2012-02088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02064

    Original file (BC 2014 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2306, “For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 Aug 09, no additional service is required.” Given that the applicant was eligible for retirement prior to 1 Aug 09, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. Based on the applicant’s retirement date, he retired prior to the TEB program being established and therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04352

    Original file (BC-2011-04352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    110-252, for the first time in history, service members were able to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to their dependents. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 Sep 10, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03009

    Original file (BC 2012 03009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03009 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his children. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he converted his old GI Bill benefits to the Post 9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00676

    Original file (BC 2014 00676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her military service obligation be changed to no later than 18 Jul 2015 in regards to transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits. (3)(2), “For individuals eligible for retirement on or after Aug 1, 2011, 2 years of additional service required.” The DoDI clearly states the amount of service commitment that a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02849

    Original file (BC 2014 02849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant admits that the error was on his part, but requests that the Board adjust the “date of submission” to his original date of Mar 13. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03501

    Original file (BC 2014 03501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    “For those members eligible for retirement after 1 Aug 10 and on or before 1 Aug 11, two years of additional service from the date of request is required.” Based on the date he became eligible to retire, he would have incurred a two-year active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation from the date he applied for the TEB. The applicant did not make a request for transfer prior to his retirement date of 4 May 12. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04355

    Original file (BC-2011-04355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...